Asics Gel-Excel33 3 Review: Still Worth It in 2025?

The Asics Gel-Excel33 3 promises comfort, breathability, and support for neutral runners—but does this 2014 classic hold up today? I tested it over 50 miles on roads and gravel to evaluate its cushioning, wider toe box, and durability.

In this review, I’ll share real-world insights, pros and cons, and whether it’s a smart buy at $62-$120, especially for beginners seeking reliable training shoes. Let’s see if it still delivers a better running experience.

Key Features of the Asics Gel-Excel33 3

Launched over a decade ago, the Gel-Excel33 3 remains a solid neutral running shoe. Here’s what stands out:

1. Weight: 303g (men’s), 255g (women’s)—ideal for training, not racing.
2. Wider Toe Box: Updated for a natural takeoff, perfect for runners with broad feet.
3. Cushioning: Rearfoot Gel and FluidRide midsole absorb shock and add plushness.
4. Durability: AHAR rubber outsole resists wear on tough terrain.
   Compared to modern shoes like the Asics Gel-Nimbus 26, it lacks advanced stability tech but shines in affordability and comfort.

Real-World Test: 50 Miles Later

My first runs in the Gel-Excel33 3 were rocky. Fresh out of the box, the shoe felt stiff, and my toes needed time to settle into the wider fit. Like many runners breaking in new kicks, I struggled for the first 20 miles. But I stuck with it, curious about its potential.

By mile 30, the comfort kicked in. The EVA cushioning and breathable mesh upper kept my feet cool and supported, even on a 10-mile gravel loop. Unlike my old Saucony pair, this shoe handled long distances without pinching or overheating. My personal trainer even noted my pace improved slightly—credit to the responsive Gel cushioning. The grip held firm on wet roads too, though I wouldn’t trust it on slick trails.

At 50 miles, the outsole showed minimal wear, proving its durability. Style-wise, the sleek design and bold accents still turn heads—a bonus for a fashion-conscious runner like me.

Pros and Cons After Testing

Pros

• Unmatched Comfort: Plush EVA and a breathable mesh upper shine on long runs.
• Built to Last: AHAR rubber and FluidRide midsole barely scuffed after 50 miles.
• Shock Absorption: Rearfoot Gel cushioned every heel strike, cutting leg fatigue.

Cons

• Limited Stability: Minimal support made uneven ground tricky—stick to roads.
• Break-In Period: Stiff for the first 20 miles, testing early patience.

Who Should Buy the Asics Gel-Excel33 3?

Price Range

At $62-$120, it’s a budget-friendly pick. Prices vary by retailer, so shop around for deals.

Arch Support and Pronation

This neutral shoe suits runners who don’t overpronate or underpronate. Not sure of your type? Consult a pro at a running store. It offers ample cushioning but lacks stability features for high arches or flat feet.

Terrain

Best for roads, tracks, and light gravel. Skip trails—its traction isn’t built for mud or rocks.

Use

Perfect for daily training, not speed work. At 303g (men’s) and 255g (women’s), it’s too hefty for races but boosts endurance runs.

How It Compares

The Gel-Excel33 3 rivals shoes like the Brooks Pureflow 3 and ON Cloudster. The Brooks offers lighter weight (around 240g) and softer cushioning, ideal for daily flexibility. The ON Cloudster adds Cloudtec for long-distance plushness and forward propulsion, akin to the Excel33’s Trusstic system. All three prioritize comfort over stability, but the Asics wins on durability and price—great if you’re not chasing cutting-edge tech.

Is It Worth It in 2025?

The Asics Gel-Excel33 3 still delivers in 2025. Its high heel (10/10) and forefoot (9-10/10) cushioning protect against impact, while the durable build lasts beyond 400km for disciplined runners. At $62-$120, it’s a steal for beginners or budget runners who stick to roads. Stability lags (3/10), so cautious footing is key on uneven paths.

Compared to the $160 Gel-Nimbus 26, it’s less refined but hard to beat for value. I’d recommend it for casual training—not trails or speed sessions. After 50 miles, it’s earned a spot in my rotation.